This NBA Insider Stole Millions — And It’s a Warning for Every Business

This is the kind of story that feels almost unbelievable, until you realize how often versions of it actually happen.

A former executive with the Atlanta Hawks was recently sentenced to more than three years in federal prison after embezzling millions of dollars from the organization. But while the headline may sound like a one-off scandal, the underlying issue is far more common and, frankly, far more relevant to everyday businesses.

Because this isn’t really a sports story. It’s a controls story.

The Case: Millions Lost From Inside the Organization

According to federal prosecutors, former Hawks executive Lester T. Jones Jr. stole approximately $3.7 million over several years through fraudulent expense reimbursements and misuse of corporate credit cards.

Jones, who worked in the team’s accounting and finance department and later became a senior vice president, had significant control over financial systems — including expense approvals and corporate card programs. That access allowed him to:

  • Submit fake reimbursement requests

  • Charge personal expenses to company accounts

  • Conceal transactions through internal processes

The funds were used to support a lavish personal lifestyle, including luxury travel, high-end retail purchases, jewelry, and entertainment expenses.

In April 2026, he was sentenced to three years and five months in prison and ordered to pay nearly $3.9 million in restitution.

The Bigger Issue: Insider Risk Is the Hardest to Catch

What makes cases like this so damaging isn’t just the dollar amount — it’s where the risk comes from.

This wasn’t an external hack or an obvious fraud attempt. It was an insider with:

  • Authority

  • System access

  • Knowledge of controls

  • The ability to override or bypass processes

As investigators noted, the case highlights the risk of “insider threats” within organizations, where trusted employees exploit gaps in oversight.

That’s where many businesses — especially growing ones — are most vulnerable.

How These Schemes Actually Happen

While the scale of this case is extreme, the mechanics are not.

Fraud schemes like this often rely on:

1. Weak Segregation of Duties

When one person can:

  • Approve expenses

  • Submit reimbursements

  • Access accounts

…it creates a built-in opportunity for abuse.

2. Lack of Oversight

Even in large organizations, expense systems can go unchecked if:

  • Reports aren’t regularly reviewed

  • Documentation isn’t verified

  • Patterns aren’t monitored

3. Trust Without Verification

Many businesses rely heavily on trusted employees, especially long-tenured or senior staff.

But trust without verification is where problems start.

Why This Matters for Small and Mid-Sized Businesses

It’s easy to look at a professional sports franchise and assume this doesn’t apply.

But in reality, smaller businesses may be at even greater risk.

Why?

  • Fewer controls

  • Smaller teams (less separation of duties)

  • Informal processes

  • Less frequent audits

And while most businesses won’t face a $3.7 million loss, even a fraction of that can be devastating.

The Tax Angle Most People Don’t Think About

There’s another layer to cases like this that often gets overlooked: taxes.

When embezzlement occurs:

  • The stolen funds are typically considered taxable income to the individual committing the fraud

  • The business may be able to claim a theft loss deduction, depending on timing and circumstances

  • Recovering funds (like restitution) can create additional tax implications

These situations can quickly become complex, particularly when losses span multiple years.

How Businesses Can Protect Themselves

The takeaway here isn’t fear — it’s awareness.

A few key steps can dramatically reduce risk:

Separate Financial Responsibilities

No single person should control:

  • Expense approvals

  • Payment processing

  • Reconciliation

Review Expense Activity Regularly

Look for:

  • Unusual patterns

  • Repeated vendors

  • High-dollar reimbursements

Require Documentation

Every reimbursement should have:

  • Receipts

  • Clear business purpose

  • Independent approval

Conduct Periodic Reviews

Even informal internal reviews can catch issues early.

The former Hawks executive’s case is a reminder of something many business owners don’t think about until it’s too late:

The biggest risks often come from inside the organization, not from outside it.

Strong financial controls aren’t just about compliance.  They’re about protecting the business you’ve built.

Because whether you’re running an NBA franchise or a small local company, the principle is the same:

Access without oversight is always a risk.

Share this article...

Want our best tax and accounting tips and insights delivered to your inbox?

Sign up for our newsletter.

I confirm this is a service inquiry and not an advertising message or solicitation. By clicking “Submit”, I acknowledge and agree to the creation of an account and to the and .

Privileged And Confidential
This communication and any accompanying documents are confidential and privileged. They are intended for the sole use of the addressee. If you receive this transmission in error, you are advised that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance upon this communication is strictly prohibited. Moreover, any such disclosure shall not compromise or waive the attorney-client, accountant-client, or other privileges as to this communication or otherwise. If you have received this communication in error, please contact me at the above email address. Thank you.

Disclaimer
Any accounting, business or tax advice contained in this communication, including attachments and enclosures, is not intended as a thorough, in-depth analysis of specific issues, nor a substitute for a formal opinion, nor is it sufficient to avoid tax-related penalties. If desired, Tobi Li Marshall CPA, APC would be pleased to perform the requisite research and provide you with a detailed written analysis. Such an engagement may be the subject of a separate engagement letter that would define the scope and limits of the desired consultation services.